==================
Repository Streams
==================

Status
======

:Date: 2008-04-11

This document describes the proposed programming interface for streaming
data from and into repositories. This programming interface should allow
a single interface for pulling data from and inserting data into a Bazaar
repository.

.. contents::


Motivation
==========

To eliminate the current requirement that extracting data from a
repository requires either using a slow format, or knowing the format of
both the source repository and the target repository.


Use Cases
=========

Here's a brief description of use cases this interface is intended to
support.

Fetch operations
----------------

We fetch data between repositories as part of push/pull/branch operations.
Fetching data is currently an very interactive process with lots of
requests. For performance having the data be supplied in a stream will
improve push and pull to remote servers. For purely local operations the
streaming logic should help reduce memory pressure. In fetch operations
we always know the formats of both the source and target.

Smart server operations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

With the smart server we support one streaming format, but this is only
usable when both the client and server have the same model of data, and
requires non-optimal IO ordering for pack to pack operations. Ideally we
can both provide optimal IO ordering the pack to pack case, and correct
ordering for pack to knits.

Bundles
-------

Bundles also create a stream of data for revisions from a repository.
Unlike fetch operations we do not know the format of the target at the
time the stream is created. It would be good to be able to treat bundles
as frozen branches and repositories, so a serialised stream should be
suitable for this.

Data conversion
---------------

At this point we are not trying to integrate data conversion into this
interface, though it is likely possible.


Characteristics
===============

Some key aspects of the described interface are discussed in this section.

Single round trip
-----------------

All users of this should be able to create an appropriate stream from a
single round trip.

Forward-only reads
------------------

There should be no need to seek in a stream when inserting data from it
into a repository. This places an ordering constraint on streams which
some repositories do not need.


Serialisation
=============

At this point serialisation of a repository stream has not been specified.
Some considerations to bear in mind about serialisation are worth noting
however.

Weaves
------

While there shouldn't be too many users of weave repositories anymore,
avoiding pathological behaviour when a weave is being read is a good idea.
Having the weave itself embedded in the stream is very straight forward
and does not need expensive on the fly extraction and re-diffing to take
place.

Bundles
-------

Being able to perform random reads from a repository stream which is a
bundle would allow stacking a bundle and a real repository together. This
will need the pack container format to be used in such a way that we can
avoid reading more data than needed within the pack container's readv
interface.


Specification
=============

This describes the interface for requesting a stream, and the programming
interface a stream must provide. Streams that have been serialised should
expose the same interface.

Requesting a stream
-------------------

To request a stream, three parameters are needed:

 * A revision search to select the revisions to include.
 * A data ordering flag. There are two values for this - 'unordered' and
   'topological'. 'unordered' streams are useful when inserting into
   repositories that have the ability to perform atomic insertions.
   'topological' streams are useful when converting data, or when
   inserting into repositories that cannot perform atomic insertions (such
   as knit or weave based repositories).
 * A complete_inventory flag. When provided this flag signals the stream
   generator to include all the data needed to construct the inventory of
   each revision included in the stream, rather than just deltas. This is
   useful when converting data from a repository with a different
   inventory serialisation, as pure deltas would not be able to be
   reconstructed.


Structure of a stream
---------------------

A stream is an object. It can be consistency checked via the ``check``
method (which consumes the stream). The ``iter_contents`` method can be
used to iterate the contents of the stream. The contents of the stream are
a series of top level records, each of which contains one or more
bytestrings (potentially as a delta against another item in the
repository) and some optional metadata.


Consuming a stream
------------------

To consume a stream, obtain an iterator from the streams
``iter_contents`` method. This iterator will yield the top level records.
Each record has two attributes. One is ``key_prefix`` which is a tuple key
prefix for the names of each of the bytestrings in the record. The other
attribute is ``entries``, an iterator of the individual items in the
record. Each item that the iterator yields is a factory which has metadata
about the entry and the ability to return the compressed bytes. This
factory can be decorated to allow obtaining different representations (for
example from a compressed knit fulltext to a plain fulltext). 

In pseudocode::

  stream = repository.get_repository_stream(search, UNORDERED, False)
  for record in stream.iter_contents():
      for factory in record.entries:
          compression = factory.storage_kind
          print "Object %s, compression type %s, %d bytes long." % (
              record.key_prefix + factory.key,
              compression, len(factory.get_bytes_as(compression)))

This structure should allow stream adapters to be written which can coerce
all records to the type of compression that a particular client needs. For
instance, inserting into weaves requires fulltexts, so a stream would be
adapted for weaves by an adapter that takes a stream, and the target
weave, and then uses the target weave to reconstruct full texts (which is
all that the weave inserter would ask for). In a similar approach, a
stream could internally delta compress many fulltexts and be able to
answer both fulltext and compressed record requests without extra IO.

factory metadata
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Valid attributes on the factory are:
 * sha1: Optional ascii representation of the sha1 of the bytestring (after
   delta reconstruction).
 * storage_kind: Required kind of storage compression that has been used
   on the bytestring. One of ``mpdiff``, ``knit-annotated-ft``,
   ``knit-annotated-delta``, ``knit-ft``, ``knit-delta``, ``fulltext``.
 * parents: Required graph parents to associate with this bytestring.
 * compressor_data: Required opaque data relevant to the storage_kind.
   (This is set to None when the compressor has no special state needed)
 * key: The key for this bytestring. Like each parent this is a tuple that
   should have the key_prefix prepended to it to give the unified
   repository key name.

..
   vim: ft=rst tw=74 ai

